Asthma (AST) - QOF indicator
Peer reviewed by Patient infomatics teamAuthored by Patient infomatics teamOriginally published 8 Oct 2026
Meets Patient’s editorial guidelines
- DownloadDownload
- Share
- Language
- Discussion
- Audio Version
- Add to preferred sources on Google
Medical Professionals
Professional Reference articles are designed for health professionals to use. They are written by UK doctors and based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. You may find one of our health articles more useful.
Asthma in QOF 2026/27
The asthma indicators cover objective testing around diagnosis and the content of ongoing asthma reviews. Notable features of the 2026/27 guidance include alignment with the joint BTS, NICE and SIGN guideline published in November 2024, alongside specific requirements for recording tests and reviews.
Indicators
Indicator ID | Description | Points | Thresholds |
|---|---|---|---|
Initial diagnosis | |||
AST014 | The percentage of patients with a new diagnosis of asthma on or after 1 April 2025 with a record of an objective test between 3 months before or 3 months after diagnosis. | 15 | 45–80% |
Ongoing management | |||
AST015 | The percentage of patients with asthma on the register, who have had an asthma review in the preceding 12 months that includes an assessment of asthma control, a recording of the number of exacerbations, an assessment of inhaler technique and a written personalised action plan. | 20 | 45–70% |
Why asthma is included
Most asthma care takes place in primary care. The condition is common, and suitable management can achieve a good response.
AST014: objective testing at diagnosis
Basis for the indicator
AST014 is based on NICE IND272.
The indicator draws on the joint asthma guideline issued by the British Thoracic Society (BTS), NICE and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) in November 2024.
Its purpose is to promote confirmation of asthma through objective testing alongside a compatible clinical history. The testing pathway differs between adults and children and young people aged 5 to 16. More accurate diagnosis should mean fewer attacks in people whose asthma has gone untreated, and less unnecessary medication for people who do not have asthma.
Although the guideline places particular tests earlier in the diagnostic pathway, any of the eligible objective tests can satisfy the indicator.
Diagnostic testing in adults and young people aged over 16 years
For patients aged over 16 years whose history points towards asthma, BTS, NICE and SIGN set out this testing sequence:
Start with a blood eosinophil count or fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement. Either an eosinophil count exceeding the laboratory reference range or FeNO of 50 ppb or more supports a diagnosis of asthma.
Where these tests have not confirmed asthma, use spirometry to assess bronchodilator reversibility (BDR). Asthma is diagnosed when forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) rises by 12% or more and 200 ml or more compared with the pre-bronchodilator value, or by 10% or more of predicted normal FEV1.
When spirometry cannot be accessed or is delayed, ask for peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements twice daily for 2 weeks. Variability of 20% or more, calculated as amplitude percentage mean, supports the diagnosis.
If clinical suspicion remains despite no confirmation from eosinophils, FeNO, BDR or PEF variability, refer for assessment of whether a bronchial challenge test is needed. Demonstrated bronchial hyper-responsiveness confirms asthma.
Diagnostic testing in children aged 5 to 16
For children and young people aged 5 to 16 years with a history pointing towards asthma:
Begin with FeNO: a result of 35ppb or more supports the diagnosis. If FeNO is not elevated, or testing cannot be accessed or carried out, assess BDR using spirometry. Diagnostic criteria are an FEV1 rise of 12% or more against baseline, or 10% or more of predicted normal FEV1.
If spirometry is unavailable or delayed, record PEF twice daily for 2 weeks. A diagnosis is supported by variability of 20% or more, expressed as amplitude percentage mean.
If FeNO, BDR and PEF variability have not established the diagnosis but asthma remains clinically likely, arrange either skin prick testing for house dust mite or measurement of blood total immunoglobulin E (IgE) and eosinophils.
A skin prick test showing no house dust mite sensitisation, or a total serum IgE that is not elevated, excludes asthma.
Sensitisation or an elevated total IgE, together with an eosinophil count of more than 0.5 x 109 per litre, supports a diagnosis of asthma.
Any remaining diagnostic uncertainty warrants referral to a paediatric specialist to consider bronchial challenge testing.
Further considerations
For an adult, young person or child aged 5 or over with a suggestive history who cannot undertake any objective test, use inhaled steroids and arrange regular reviews. Reattempt testing every 6-12 months until satisfactory results can be obtained. Personalised Care Adjustments (PCAs) can be used where a patient declines testing or does not attend, or where testing is unsuitable or not feasible.
NICE advises looking for an occupational contribution in adult-onset asthma, established asthma with poor control, or childhood asthma that has returned. Suspected occupational asthma requires referral to a specialist in occupational asthma; this is addressed in section 1.4 of the guideline.
NHS England is helping systems expand community access to objective tests, particularly spirometry. Commissioning standards describe how services can be commissioned to provide equitable access to quality-assured spirometry for all ages.
When a different diagnosis is suspected
If another condition appears more likely, use the relevant guidance for its investigation and management.
Coexisting asthma and COPD
Some patients have both asthma and COPD. For example, marked reversibility may be present even though airflow obstruction does not fully return to normal.
AST014 reporting and verification
The indicator definition sets the qualifying requirements. For measurement, the 3 months before diagnosis are counted as 93 days.
AST015: ongoing asthma review
Basis for the indicator
AST015 is based on NICE IND273.
The joint NICE, BTS and SIGN asthma guideline underpins this indicator.
AST015 assesses review coverage among patients on the asthma register over the preceding 12 months. Its focus is on care processes associated with better outcomes: assessing control, documenting exacerbation numbers and providing a written personalised action plan, with inhaler technique assessment also required by the indicator definition.
An annual review offers an opportunity to recognise patients at greater risk of poor outcomes and use the findings to shape support for self-management and future health. Before initiating or changing medication, discussion with the patient should include adherence checks using prescription records, assessment of control and direct observation of inhaler technique. Validated symptom tools may help assess control, including the Asthma Control Questionnaire, Asthma Control Test and Childhood Asthma Control Test. Also explore other explanations for poor control, including smoking, workplace exposures and psychosocial, seasonal or environmental influences.
Section 1.15 of the joint guideline recommends considering proactive identification of patients at risk of poor outcomes so that their care can be adapted accordingly.
Sections 1.5 (monitoring asthma control) and 1.14 (self-management) provide more detail on assessing control and creating personalised action plans, including the need to update those plans.
The joint guideline also introduces several recommendations on drug treatment for asthma.
At any age, a short-acting beta2 agonist must be accompanied by a prescription for an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), as set out in recommendation 1.6.3. Treatment algorithms are available for people aged 12 years and over and for children aged 5 to 11 years.
People aged 12 years and over whose asthma remains uncontrolled despite treatment containing a high dose of ICS should be referred to an asthma specialist (1.7.11). For children aged 5-11, referral is required if control is not achieved with paediatric moderate-dose Maintenance and Reliever Therapy (MART), or paediatric moderate-dose ICS/Long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA) maintenance treatment. The latter may be used with or without a Leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), according to previous response (1.8.7).
PCAs may apply when a patient declines or misses the review, or when an annual review is inappropriate.
Alongside NICE's Tools and resources, support for implementing AST015 and AST014 is available from:
Asthma + Lung UK
British Thoracic Society
Primary Care Respiratory Society
beatasthma.co.uk, for children and young people
The National Review of Asthma (NRAD) provides further material on asthma care and recommendations aimed at preventing future asthma deaths.
AST015 reporting and verification
Use the indicator definition to establish eligibility and requirements. Children under 5 do not count towards AST015.
To satisfy the business rules, contractors must code the asthma review, the number of exacerbations in the month before the asthma review, and provision of a written personalised asthma plan. All must be recorded on the same day as the asthma review.
Exclusive updates for healthcare professionals
Stay informed with the latest clinical updates, professional insights, and evidence-based guidance. The Patient Pro newsletter curates essential content for healthcare professionals—delivered straight to your inbox.
By subscribing you accept our Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe at any time. We never sell your data.
About the authorView full bio

Patient infomatics team
The Patient.info Informatics Team ensures our medical content and tools are accurate, evidence-based, and aligned with trusted NHS and NICE guidance.
About the reviewerView full bio

Patient infomatics team
The Patient.info Informatics Team ensures our medical content and tools are accurate, evidence-based, and aligned with trusted NHS and NICE guidance.
Article history
Article also available in English, German, Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, and Swedish.
Next review due: 1 Apr 2027
8 Oct 2026 | Originally published
Authored by:
Patient infomatics teamPeer reviewed by
Patient infomatics team

Ask, share, connect.
Browse discussions, ask questions, and share experiences across hundreds of health topics.

Feeling unwell?
Assess your symptoms online for free
More in quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF)
- NewAtrial fibrillation (AF) - QOF indicator
- NewBlood pressure (BP) - QOF indicator
- NewCardiovascular disease (CD) - QOF indicator
- NewCervical screening (CS) - QOF indicator
- NewCholesterol control and lipid management (CHOL) - QOF indicator
- NewChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) - QOF indicator
- NewDementia (DEM) - QOF indicator
- NewDiabetes mellitus (DM) - QOF indicator
- NewHeart failure (HF) - QOF indicator
- NewHypertension (HYP) - QOF indicator
- NewMental health (MH) - QOF indicator
- NewNon-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH) - QOF indicator
- NewObesity (OB) - QOF indicator
- NewSecondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) - QOF indicator
- NewSmoking (SMOK) - QOF indicator
- NewStroke and TIA (STIA) - QOF indicator
- NewVaccination and immunisations (VI) - QOF indicator